Lowering the Stakes: toward a Model of Effective Copyright Dispute Resolution
نویسنده
چکیده
The digital revolution, the popularization of the internet, and the proliferation of file sharing applications have caused some to question the effectiveness of American copyright law. While lawsuits by the Recording Industry Association of America, the Motion Picture Association of America, and other organizations against both technological innovators and individual file sharers have put a spotlight on the inadequacies of traditional federal litigation as a method of resolving copyright infringement disputes, such problems are not unique to the digital environment. Rather than crafting potential solutions that focus exclusively on digital infringement, policymakers should consider reforming the underlying problems that have contributed to the current situation. The federal government could best accomplish this goal of facilitating an inexpensive, fair, and humane method of copyright enforcement by creating a federal small claims court that would allow litigants to resolve copyright infringement disputes equitably and efficiently.
منابع مشابه
اثرگذاری منازعات حقوقی پیشین کشورها در سازمان تجارت جهانی بر منازعات فعلی آنها
The dispute resolution mechanism in the World Trade Organization is a way of leveraging in the political and economic relationships. Countries’ legal knowledge plays a substantial role on disputes’ initiation and continuation. This study assesses the effect of previous WTO disputes on the hazard rate of attendance in a new one, using survival analysis. Our dataset encompasses 427 disputes from ...
متن کاملاصل محرمانه بودن در شیوههای جایگزین حل اختلاف
In contrast with general principle of open legal proceedings in governmental courts we have a general rule governing on arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution like negotiation, arbitration, mediation, privacy & confidentiality proceedings. In other words, in this method third parties except for parties of dispute are not authorized to be present and observe parties disputes. F...
متن کاملShadow of the Contract: How Contract Structure Shapes Interfirm Dispute Resolution
This paper investigates how contract structure influences interfirm dispute resolution processes and outcomes by examining a unique dataset consisting of over 150,000 pages of documents relating to 102 business disputes. We find that the level of contract detail affects the type of dispute resolution approach that is adopted when conflict arises, and that different approaches are associated wit...
متن کاملResearch on Principle-Based Contract Dispute Negotiation System :a Case in Construction Industry
Contract dispute resolution has become an important aspect in the negotiating process. Objective and effective contract dispute resolution can reduce the high transaction cost and time in the negotiation process. This paper proposes a principle-based contract dispute negotiation system based on expert system and knowledge resource space model (KRSM). The system provides an accurate and objectiv...
متن کاملBargaining in the shadow of precedent: the surprising irrelevance of asymmetric stakes
We develop a model of bargaining and litigation in the context of patent licensing (or any contractual setting). Following Priest and Klein (1984) we developed a model that explicitly allows for (1) multiple parties (leading to asymmetry of stakes), (2) binding precedent, and (3) pre-dispute bargaining done in the “shadow” of precedent-setting courts. The pre-dispute bargaining creates an endog...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007